Equity

Individual clubs should have Equity Policies. This is crucial, as all participating clubs need to uphold a standard of conduct that represents CUSID. Equity policies are extremely useful in establishing that inequitable actions (i.e. bullying and harassment), are not allowed by members of participating institutions, and allows for individuals to take recourse against members who violate Codes of Conduct.

It is the responsibility of our society to uphold the safety and security of its members. Debating is supposed to be a space where participants feel comfortable to express their views. If someone violates our Code of Conduct in any other space, members of CUSID may still feel uncomfortable in our space. Similar principles apply in universities, where actions that violate their codes of conduct (i.e. harassment and bullying) off campus will still result in action taken by the university. 

Equity complaints should be allowed to be filed anonymously. There are two main situations where anonymous complaints may be beneficial. (1) Many anonymous equity complaints raise issues that do not require follow-up (i.e. an inequitable team name). There is no need to attach an individual’s name to these complaints. (2) Complainants often do not feel comfortable attaching their names to a complaint for many reasons (i.e. confidentiality, backlash, retraumatization). This does not mean they do not deserve follow-up action to be taken. Equity teams should follow-up and documenting these reports when possible.

A lot of data that has been collected by tournaments have become crucial to establishing why Equity is important (i.e. Is there really a gender problem in CUSID Central?). CUSID should be making more of an effort to track and document this information.

It is crucial that participants of a tournament are able to work with Equity Officers to create a space where people feel safe. We strongly believe that those who participate in debate should practice empathy even during competitions. This means that participants should be willing to learn from mistakes they have made, and should work towards not violating equity (i.e. respecting gender pronouns, etc.).

Debating is not supposed to be the Wild West for freedom of speech. It is widely known that CUSID is a rather undiverse space (read more in Equity Resources) because of the overt and covert discrimination that people face. 

Debate is a unique space because people are not allowed to pick what they advocate for. This is why many motions that are highly triggering and emotion-filled (i.e. THW ban abortion at all stages of pregnancy) are discouraged. People should empathize with those who have lived other lived experiences, as they may never be able to see “both sides of the motion” for the sake of a debate round. This is not representative of their debating skills, but rather of their lived experiences.